The California Supreme Court decided recently that the will of the voters does not matter. What matters is bending the constitution to fit the needs of a highly vocal minority.
“The remedy is a constitutional amendment,” said Glen Lavy of the Alliance Defense Fund, which is pushing for the stay. In 2000, Proposition 22 passed with 61 percent of the voted, strengthening the state’s 1978 one-man, one-woman marriage law. The ruling struck down both statutes.
Awesome. Why not repeal gravity while you are at it? It’s not as if these asswipes will have to face a recall election for their tyranny. Interesting how Proposition 22 was perfectly fine for 8 years. Not to mention that the 1978 law was perfectly good for 3 decades.
It is becoming more and more clear that the advocates of “gay marriage” are perfectly willing to got to the courts to force their ideas on us. The old standard of raising awareness through the media and the court of public opinion is not good enough. Better that unelected, unaccountable judges should “interpret” the constitution to mean whatever they want it to mean. In this case, that everyone is entitled to be “happy”. Since when is happiness a basic human right?
Does anyone hear that? It’s the sound of Thomas Jefferson’s coffin spinning.
I wonder if this means if polygamists, bigamists and people who wish to marry their siblings will get their day in court. I doubt it. Don’t they have a “right” to be happy too?
No Comments Yet
No comments yet.
Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI
Leave a comment
